<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Democratic National Committee</title>
<link>http://www.collegedems.com</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>




<copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:45:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=4.01</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 


<item>
<title>Chairman Kaine Hails New Poll that Shows Increasing Support for the Recently Enacted Health Insurance Reforms</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A new poll conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation shows increased public support for the health insurance reforms enacted by President Obama this spring and decreased public opposition to those reforms. Specifically, only 35 percent of respondents now oppose the Affordable Care Act reforms, down 9 percent from May, and 50 percent of respondents now view the law favorably, a 9 percent increase from May – an 18 point swing in favor of the Affordable Care Act in just 60 days. In response, DNC Chairman Tim Kaine issued the following statement:<br />
 <blockquote><p>“As this poll and others have shown, the more Americans learn about the benefits of the Affordable Care Act, the more they embrace the historic changes enacted by President Obama and Congressional Democrats this spring.  The number of Americans who support reform is growing, the number who oppose it is falling and since May nearly one in ten Americans have changed their mind about the law and now view it favorably.  And there is every reason to believe the number of Americans who support reform will continue to grow as more businesses, workers, and families begin to realize the benefits of reform, and as it becomes increasingly obvious that the fear and myths spread by Republicans – from death panels to rationing – were simply not true.</p><p>“Instead, health insurance reform is conveying new benefits to millions of Americans.  From young people who can now remain on their parents’ insurance as they look for work or complete their degree to older Americans who are receiving new help to purchase life-saving prescription medications to small business owners who may be eligible for a health care tax credit worth thousands of dollars to help cover the cost of insuring their employees, this law makes health insurance more available and affordable for Americans of all kinds.  In addition, it ends the worst practices of the insurance industry and guarantees that no American need every worry again that their coverage will be revoked when they need it most or that they won’t be able to get coverage in the first place.  <br />
 <br />
“Those changes are quite simply historic.  It took nearly a century to enact comprehensive health insurance reform but, as this poll and others have shown, it will take far less time for the vast majority of Americans to embrace their new health care rights and benefits.”<br />
 </blockquote></p>

<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/29/AR2010072900004_pf.html">Read the Washington Post story on the Kaiser Family Foundation poll. </a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/chairman_kaine_26.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/chairman_kaine_26.php</guid>
<category>Blog</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:45:03 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Something Republicans Don&apos;t Have: Supporters Like You</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>DNC Executive Director Jen O'Malley Dillion sent the following message to supporters, asking them to volunteer and help fight the Republican special-interest agenda: </p>

<blockquote><p>They just couldn't help themselves.</p><p>

<p>On Tuesday, 40 Republican senators blocked the passage of legislation that would counteract the growing influence of corporations in the wake of the Citizens United Supreme Court decision.</p>

<p>The DISCLOSE Act would have helped shed light on the hundreds of millions of dollars corporations and special interests plan to spend to influence our elections this fall -- and would have helped ordinary Americans to make their voices more clearly heard in campaigns across the country.</p>

<p>Republicans believe that killing the bill and strengthening corporate power gives them a tactical edge, allowing right-wing groups to raise more than ever to help their candidates win.</p>

<p>It's a stark reminder, both of what we're up against in November and the reason we all need to fight so hard to elect Democrats. Now more than ever, we need people like you on sidewalks and doorsteps, talking to your friends and neighbors about what meaningful reforms like these would mean in their lives -- and why it's so vital that they make their voices heard this fall.<br />
<strong><br />
<a href="http://my.democrats.org/DISCLOSEVolunteer-HQB">Sign up now to volunteer for our Vote 2010 efforts and help fight the Republican special-interest agenda.</a></strong></p>

<p>Despite the fact 80 percent of Americans disagreed with the Citizens United decision -- which eliminated limits on corporate spending in political campaigns -- obstructionist Republicans have sided with the special interests yet again. But that doesn't mean we can't hold them accountable for it.</p>

<p>Republicans believe the support of the big corporations and the special interests is all they need, but we have a different approach. We're building a new Democratic party -- one driven by the opinions and support of Americans around the country and focused on grassroots organizing.</p>

<p><strong>That's something Republicans just don't have: supporters like you.</strong></p>

<p>The obstruction of bills like DISCLOSE affects every voter in the country -- and we're all in this together. We need your help on the ground now, helping to make the case to friends and neighbors about the importance of their vote in November's elections. Please sign up to volunteer today:</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://my.democrats.org/DISCLOSEVolunteer-HQB">http://my.democrats.org/DISCLOSEVolunteer</a></strong></p>

<p>Thanks,</p>

<p>Jen</p>

<p>Jen O'Malley Dillon<br />
Executive Director<br />
Democratic National Committee<br />
</blockquote></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/something_repub.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/something_repub.php</guid>
<category>Blog</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:53:55 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Republicans Embrace Extreme Tea Party Ideas</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, DNC Chairman Tim Kaine, DNC Vice Chairs Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Mike Honda, and other Democratic Members of Congress held a press conference announcing the release of the Republican Tea Party Contract on America, a compilation of ten extreme conservative Tea Party ideas that Republicans have adopted as part of their own platform.  </p>

<p>The Contract includes, among other things, repealing health insurance reform and Wall Street reform, ending Social Security and Medicare as we know them, and extending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy while growing the federal deficit.  Every single one of those positions has been advanced by Republican leaders in Congress or Republican candidates nationally, but even we would have supposed that at least a few Republicans would take issue with some of the most extreme positions.  After all, could it really be true that there’s not a single Republican willing to stand against the dismantling of Social Security?  At least for now, that seems to be the case.</p>

<p>As the Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/28/AR2010072804025.html">reported</a> yesterday, a spokesman for the RNC “would not say whether the RNC disagrees with any of the 10 agenda items.” </p>

<p>And despite contacting the offices of multiple Republican leaders in Congress including Congressman Mike Pence, Congressman Eric Cantor, and Congressman Kevin McCarthy, CNN’s Political Ticker <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/07/28/nrcc-suggests-latest-dnc-move-is-political-quackery/?fbid=JRuNvfoIRdx#more-115389">couldn’t find</a> any Republicans who would disagree either.</p>

<p>In a statement to the Political Ticker, a spokesman for the National Republican Campaign Committee, who also refused to disavow any of the extreme conservative policies highlighted in the Contract, said:</p>

<blockquote>"Not only has this tired line of attack already been proven to be ineffective, it is offensive to voters.”</blockquote>

<p>If the NRCC considers it an ‘attack’ simply to highlight some of their candidates’ most closely held positions, perhaps they should rethink the Republican Party’s support for unpopular policies like enabling insurance companies to once again raise rates unfairly and rescind Americans’ coverage when they get sick or empowering big Wall Street banks to once again gamble taxpayers’ money away.</p>

<p>In the meantime, voters are more likely to be offended by Republicans’ continued allegiance with big banks, big insurance, big oil and other special interests – to the detriment of the American Middle Class – than by those who are simply willing to point out those ongoing relationships.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/republicans_emb.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/republicans_emb.php</guid>
<category>Blog</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:58:47 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Morning Open Thread</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Good morning.</p>

<center><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4143/4799515165_69d07cacf1_b.jpg" width="500px"><br/><br/><i>Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton talks with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel and the Israeli delegation prior to their working lunch with President Barack Obama in the Cabinet Room of the White House, July 6, 2010.  Photo by Pete Souza.</i></center>]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/morning_open_th_446.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/morning_open_th_446.php</guid>
<category>Blog</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Republican Tea Party Contract on America</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4146/4838314970_742392e6ef.jpg"></p><p>DNC Chairman Tim Kaine and Democratic members of Congress held a press conference today to highlight the real Republican agenda for America, unveiling "<strong><a href="http://www.republicanteapartycontract.com/America.com">The Republican Tea Party Contract On America</a></strong>." For the better part of the past year, Republicans have tried to come up with a new agenda for the American people with mixed results. However, with the Tea Party now the most potent force in Republican politics, the Republican agenda has become clear.

<p>Chairman Kaine summed up the Republican Tea Party Contract on America:</p>

<blockquote><p>“We’re here to offer a helpful suggestion.  Republicans and their Tea Party supporters can take a break from the town halls and relax because we have distilled their agenda for the American people into a handy ten point blue print for how they would govern that we are calling the ‘Republican Tea Party Contract on America.’  This wasn’t hard to come up with so were a little bit at a loss as to why this has been difficult for Republican leaders.  We literally have just listened to what their leaders and candidates have been saying – people who have been increasingly influenced by the Tea Party.”</p></blockquote>

<p><br />
<a href="http://www.republicanteapartycontract.com/America.com">The Republican Tea Party Contract on America</a> is a compilation of GOP leaders’ top priorities, providing Americans with a clear outline of just what the Republican Party will have to offer this fall. Republican leaders and Tea Party-supported Republican candidates from Nevada to Utah and Kentucky to Florida can now rally around the <a href="http://www.republicanteapartycontract.com/America.com">Republican Tea Party Contract on America</a>.</p>

<p>As Rep. Charlie Gonzalez said at the press conference to launch the initiative, "The Republican Party is actually saying, put us back in the driver’s seat.  The first thing that they will do is place that economic vehicle in reverse – that’s the only gear they know, because they’re guided by that view in the rearview mirror.”</p>

<p><a href="http://my.democrats.org/page/-/audio/20100728_Press_Conference.mp3">Listen to the full audio of the press conference</a> with Chairman Kaine, DNC Vice Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, DNC Vice Chair Mike Honda, Congressman Elijah E. Cummings, Congressman Charlie Gonzalez, Congressman Keith Ellison and Congressman Frank Pallone. </p>

<p>To coincide with the launch, the DNC released a new web ad on the Republican Tea Party Contract on America, One and the Same:</p>

<p><object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/f4IQ_kj9eDM&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/f4IQ_kj9eDM&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object><br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/the_republican_10.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/the_republican_10.php</guid>
<category>Blog</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:54:10 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Michelle Obama: &quot;Join me in wishing Barack a happy birthday&quot;</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Michelle Obama sent the following message to supporters asking them to join her in signing a card wishing the President a happy 49th birthday: </p>

<blockquote><p>Every year, our family tries to come up with a fun way to wish Barack a happy birthday.</p>

<p>And this August 4th, when he turns 49, I have something new in mind.</p>

<p>This has been a big -- and hectic -- year for him. After signing the Affordable Care Act and Wall Street reform into law -- and completing his first year as president -- I think it's safe to say we will remember it for a long time.</p>

<p>And I know full well how much he credits this movement, and the work of supporters like you, for the change that we've accomplished.</p>

<p>So I'm putting together a birthday card that I would like you to sign. Together with other Organizing for America supporters -- and me, Malia, Sasha, and Bo -- we'll wish him a happy birthday and let him know that we're ready to take on the year ahead alongside him.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://my.democrats.org/birthdaycard-HQB">Will you wish Barack a happy birthday with me?</a></strong></p>

<p align="center"><a href="http://my.democrats.org/birthdaycard-HQB"><img src="http://www.barackobama.com/images/email/20100726-bday_card.jpg" alt="" width="427" height="146" /></a></p>

<p>This year also brought a lot of surprises -- some good and some bad.</p>

<p>Supporters like you have helped him make the best of it -- by contacting Congress to help push stalled legislation forward, by re-engaging supporters in the political process, by giving back with service projects across the country, and so much more.</p>

<p>And while we can't know what the coming year will bring, all of us, working together, will continue pushing forward for change.</p>

<p>Will you help make this a memorable birthday for Barack and wish him a happy 49th?<br />
<strong><br />
<a href="http://my.democrats.org/birthdaycard-HQB">http://my.democrats.org/birthday</a></strong></p>

<p>Thanks so much,</p>

<p>Michelle Obama</blockquote></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/michelle_obama_2.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/michelle_obama_2.php</guid>
<category>Blog</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:15:33 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Senate Republicans Block DISCLOSE Act</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Republicans yesterday blocked the DISCLOSE Act from coming to an up-or-down vote on the Senate floor&mdash;legislation that would have undone the harmful effects of the <em>Citizens United</em> Supreme Court ruling by requiring increased transparency when it comes to our political process.</p><p>As President Obama noted before the vote, Republicans had blocked unemployment benefits, small business tax credits&mdash;and now legislation to ensure regular people&rsquo;s voices aren&rsquo;t drowned out by special interests trying to influence elections. &ldquo;On issue after issue, we are trying to move America forward,&rdquo; the President said. &ldquo;They keep on trying to take us back.&rdquo;</p><p><a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/07/28/senate_republicans_thwart_campaign_spending_bill/" target="_blank">The Boston Globe</a> reported on yesterday&rsquo;s Republican obstruction on one of the President&rsquo;s top priorities:</p><blockquote><p>Senate Republicans defeated legislation yesterday to require more disclosure in campaign spending, ending Democrats&rsquo; quest for stronger rules after a Supreme Court ruling this year allowed corporations and unions to spend unlimited sums to influence elections.</p><p>The bill had been a high priority for President Obama, who denounced the Supreme Court ruling during his State of the Union address in January, as justices sat silently in the House chamber.</p><p>On a party-line, 57-to-41 vote after a heated debate, an effort by Democrats to fight off a Republican filibuster fell short of the 60 votes required. All 40 Republicans in attendance, including Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts, voted against it....</p><p>The legislation was the congressional response to a 5-to-4 Supreme Court ruling in January that struck down limits on corporate and union spending in elections. In the legal case &mdash; Citizens United v. the Federal Election Commission &mdash; the court ruled that corporations and unions must be treated the same as individuals in campaign spending, recognizing a right to bankroll election activities as an exercise of the First Amendment.</p><p>The Supreme Court simultaneously upheld spending disclosure requirements, which Democrats tried to expand with the legislation. The House of Representatives passed a version of the bill last month.</p><p>The law would have required corporations and unions to reveal how much they spent on broadcast advertising in federal elections. And corporate CEOs or union heads would have to appear in their ads to take responsibility for the message.</p></blockquote>]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/senate_republic_7.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/senate_republic_7.php</guid>
<category>Blog</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:45:34 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Chairman Kaine Responds to a New Study Highlighting the Positive Benefits of Democrats’ Economic Recovery Efforts</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A new study conducted by Alan Blinder, former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve, and Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody’s Analytics, assessed the impact of the recovery measures taken by President Obama and Democrats in Congress and found that those efforts saved jobs and boosted national GDP.  According to Blinder and Zandi, if the President and Democrats had not acted our GDP this year would be 6.5 percent lower, 8.5 million more Americans would be out of work, and the United States would be facing the prospect of deflation.   In response, DNC Chairman Tim Kaine issued the following statement:<br />
<blockquote><p>“This study demonstrates quantitatively something we have known intuitively for months – that the bold actions taken by President Obama and Democrats in Congress to pull America back from the brink of a second Great Depression, to stabilize the financial system, to boost economic recovery, to create jobs, and to support American families through this difficult time worked exactly as intended.  Without those measures, the United States would still be in the throes of recession, millions more Americans would be out of work, and there would be no light at the end of the tunnel.  Instead, the United States has now experienced three straight quarters of economic growth and six consecutive months of private sector job growth.</p><p>“It would be simply impossible to measure the amount of human suffering that would have resulted from government inaction in the aftermath of the economic crisis, but that didn’t stop Republicans in Congress from almost uniformly opposing the President’s economic recovery efforts.  With these numbers offering clear evidence of their effectiveness, it’s time Republicans admitted the error of their ways and joined with the President and Democratic leaders to pass additional critical recovery legislation – such as legislation intended to support small business growth – and help to keep America moving forward.”</blockquote><br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/28/business/economy/28bailout.html?_r=1&emc=eta1">The New York Times story on the Blinder-Zandi study can be found here. </a> </p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/chairman_kaine_25.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/chairman_kaine_25.php</guid>
<category>Blog</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:46:44 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Morning Open Thread</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Good morning.</p>

<center><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4117/4800156908_7a5c66aefe_b.jpg" width="500px"><br/><br/><i>Residents greet President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama upon their arrival at Fort McNair in Washington, D.C., July 3, 2010.  Photo by Chuck Kennedy.</i></center>]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/morning_open_th_445.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/morning_open_th_445.php</guid>
<category>Blog</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Republican Tea Party Contract on America </title>
<description><![CDATA[<div>For the better part of the past year, Republicans have tried to come up with a new agenda for the American people with mixed results. &nbsp;However, with the Tea Party now the most potent force in Republican politics, and with the recent launch of the Tea Party Caucus on Capitol Hill garnering the support of Republican leaders like National Republican Congressional Committee Chair Pete Sessions and Republican Caucus Chair Mike Pence, the Republican Party agenda has become clear. &nbsp;Republican leaders and Tea Party supported Republican candidates can now rally around the “Republican Tea Party Contract on America” as the blueprint for how they would govern.</div><div><br /></div><div><b>1. &nbsp; &nbsp; REPEAL THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT (HEALTH INSURANCE REFORM)</b></div><div><br /></div><div>Put insurance companies back in charge, repeal tax credits for small businesses, allow insurance companies to deny coverage based on preexisting conditions and to drop coverage when a person gets too sick and make prescription drugs for seniors less affordable.</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Minority Leader John Boehner on Health Insurance Reform: “Repealing This Bill Has To Be Our Number One Priority.” “Repealing healthcare reform law will be Republicans' ‘number one priority,’ their House leader said Monday. House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) said that repealing the healthcare legislation passed in Congress last month and signed into law by President Barack Obama would be the GOP's top priority if it wins back control of Congress this fall. ‘They got everything else in the entire bureaucracy that they need to control our health care system is all in place with the signing of this bill,’ Boehner said during an interview on WFLA's Bud Hedinger Show. ‘That’s why repealing this bill has to be our number one priority.’” [The Hill, 4/12/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Rep. Paul Ryan: “We Will Repeal” The Health Care Bill. “Republicans candidates must run on repealing Democrats' healthcare reform bill in 2010, one of their top House members said Wednesday night. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), the ranking member of the House Budget Committee, encouraged candidates to run on full-scale repeal of health reform, which he conceded was likely to pass. 'As Republicans present the nation with an alternative in 2010, our message on healthcare cannot be: 'We can fix and reform this bill,' ' Ryan said at a lecture in Washington organized by the Michigan-based conservative Hillsdale College. 'Our message must be: 'We will repeal and replace this government takeover masked as healthcare reform,' ' Ryan said." [The Hill, 1/14/09]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Rep. Mike Pence: “House Republicans Will Not Rest Until We Repeal Obama Care.” &nbsp;“‘House Republicans will not rest until we repeal Obama care lock, stock and barrel and replace it with health care reform that will lower the cost of health insurance without growing the size of government,’ Pence said. Such a move to repeal is futile as Democrats have majorities in the House, Senate and hold the White House. And even if Republicans win back the House and Senate, they probably couldn’t override an Obama veto.” &nbsp;[Politico, 4/14/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Rep. Steve King: “We’re Not Going To Repeal Part Of The Bill, We’re Going To Repeal The Whole Thing.” “‘We're not going to repeal part of the bill, we're going to repeal the whole thing,’ said Steve King, an Iowa Republican, citing Senator Scott Brown's victory in Massachusetts as evidence Americans do not want the health reform bill.” [Boston Globe, 3/22/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Sen. Jim DeMint And Rep. Jeff Flake Signed The Club For Growth Pledge To Repeal The Health Care Bill. “The Club for Growth, a major force in Republican primary politics, launched a new push today to gather candidates' signatures on a pledge to fight to repeal health care legislation, if it passes. The group says it just got its first two signatures, from Senator Jim DeMint and Rep. Jeff Flake. The pledge: ‘I hereby pledge to the people of my state/district to sponsor and support legislation to repeal any federal health care takeover passed in 2010, and replace it with real reforms that lower health care costs without growing government.’” [Politico, 1/14/09]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; FL Senate Candidate Marco Rubio Pledged Full Repeal Of The Health Care Bill. U.S. Senate candidate Marco Rubio today pledged to support legislation to repeal any federal health care takeover that passes this year. In signing the Club for Growth’s “Repeal It!” health care pledge, Rubio said, “The proposed government takeover of health care being rammed through Congress runs contrary to the principles of limited government that have made Americans the freest and most prosperous people ever. As a U.S. senator, I will sponsor and support legislation to repeal any federal health care takeover passed in 2010, and replace it with real reforms that lower health care costs without growing government. “This is not just about simply opposing and repealing the Obama-Reid-Pelosi agenda. This is about putting America back on a limited government track. This will require opposing new spending binges, but also turning back some of the mistakes made by President Obama and this Congress, including the pending health care bill.” [Marco Rubio release, 1/14/10]</div><div><br /></div><div><b>2. &nbsp; &nbsp; PRIVATIZE SOCIAL SECURITY OR PHASE IT OUT ALTOGETHER</b></div><div><br /></div><div>Turn the guaranteed retirement benefits of America’s seniors over to Wall Street CEOs by putting Social Security at risk in the stock market or, as some Republicans have called for, phase out Social Security altogether and end a program millions of American seniors rely on for their survival.</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Rep. Paul Ryan’s “Road Map For America’s Future” Called For Privatizing Social Security. Rep. Paul Ryan introduced an economic plan called “A Road Map for America’s Future,” which called for changes to Social Security. According to the Ryan, “for those under 55, the plan offers the option of investing over one-third of their current Social Security taxes into personal retirement accounts, similar to the Thrift Savings Plan available to federal employees.” [Rep. Paul Ryan, Wall Street Journal, 1/26/10; HR 4529, introduced 1/27/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; NV Senate Candidate Sharron Angle Said “We Need To Phase Medicare And Social Security Out In Favor Of Something Privatized.” In May 2010, the Associated Press reported, "Sharron Angle wants to wipe out Social Security." During a May 2010 debate on Face to Face, Sharron Angle said, "We need to phase Medicare and Social Security out in favor of something privatized." She later added, "Going forward we need to phase it out, give people an opportunity to either opt into the old system or go for a new system where they have their own healthcare savings account or they have their own retirement savings account which is portable and goes with them from job to job and for those who are entering the workforce right now they come on to the new system so it's a phased-in system so it's something [inaudible] privatize." [Associated Press, 5/27/10; Face to Face Debate, 5/19/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; IN Senate Candidate Dan Coats Said That He Supported Implementing Entitlement Reform “Along The Lines Of What Paul Ryan Has Proposed.” Dan Coats “recalls that during one GOP candidate forum this spring, the candidates were asked what specifically they would do to rein in federal spending. While other candidates suggested slashing the Department of Education or a 1 percent across-the-board spending cut, Coats told the audience that those proposals simply ‘wouldn't put a dent’ in the federal debt. What we need to do, Coats says, is implement entitlement reform ‘along the lines of what Paul Ryan has proposed.’” [Weekly Standard, 5/12/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Rep. Jeb Hensarling Said That We Should Privatize Social Security And Medicare This Week. “Democrats are hoping to make the GOP pay for Jeb Hensarling's brief sojourn onto ye olde political third rail (health care's the new one) -- privatizing Social Security. On Monday, MSNBC's Chris Matthews asked the Texas Republican what solutions he had to cut the budget deficit, and Hensarling, straightfowardly replied that the only solution was to curb entitlements, including Social Security. ‘I'm willing to say that part of the social contract will need to be re-engineered,’ Hensarling said, ‘You can get better health care and better retirement security if you go to a defined contribution plan. We had this debate in Social Security a few years ago,’ added Hensarling, who predicted that such a program would have to be part of any GOP alternative budget-cutting plan.” [Politico, 2/2/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Rep. Michele Bachmann Suggested That We Get Rid Of Medicare And Social Security. “Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) is putting forward a very daring proposal for how to fix Social Security and Medicare, Think Progress reports: Get rid of them. Bachmann spoke this past weekend at the right-wing Constitutional Coalition in St. Louis, Missouri, and put forth her plan. ‘So, what you have to do, is keep faith with the people that are already in the system, that don't have any other options, we have to keep faith with them. But basically what we have to do is wean everybody else off,’ said Bachmann. ‘And wean everybody off because we have to take those unfunded net liabilities off our bank sheet, we can't do it. So we just have to be straight with people. So basically, whoever our nominee is, is going to have to have a Glenn Beck chalkboard and explain to everybody this is the way it is.’” [TPM, 2/9/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Nine House Republicans Have Co-Sponsored Ryan’s Budget Plan. “So far, nine Republicans including Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD), Rep. Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) have signed on to co-sponsor Ryan's budget roadmap.” [TPM, 2/9/10]</div><div><br /></div><div><b>3. &nbsp; &nbsp; END MEDICARE AS IT PRESENTLY EXISTS</b></div><div><br /></div><div>Phase out and end Medicare as it presently exists for future generations of seniors -- ending Medicare’s guaranteed healthcare benefits for more than 40 million American seniors -- and replace it with a voucher system which will result in higher premiums and fewer services for seniors.</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; AP: The 2009 Republican Budget Would "End Medicare As It Is Presently Known." "For their part, House Republicans are offering an alternative that eventually would end Medicare as it is presently known." [AP, 4/1/09]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; NV Senate Candidate Sharron Angle Said “We Need To Phase Medicare And Social Security Out In Favor Of Something Privatized.” In May 2010, the Associated Press reported, "Sharron Angle wants to wipe out Social Security." During a May 2010 debate on Face to Face, Sharron Angle said, "We need to phase Medicare and Social Security out in favor of something privatized." She later added, "Going forward we need to phase it out, give people an opportunity to either opt into the old system or go for a new system where they have their own healthcare savings account or they have their own retirement savings account which is portable and goes with them from job to job and for those who are entering the workforce right now they come on to the new system so it's a phased-in system so it's something [inaudible] privatize." [Associated Press, 5/27/10; Face to Face Debate, 5/19/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Rep. Paul Ryan’s Budget Proposal Replaces Medicare With A Voucher To Buy Private Health Insurance. “The Roadmap secures Medicare for current beneficiaries, while making common-sense reforms to save this critical program. … For those currently under 55 – as they become Medicare-eligible – it creates a Medicare payment, initially averaging $11,000, to be used to purchase a Medicare certified plan. The payment is adjusted to reflect medical inflation, and pegged to income, with low-income individuals receiving greater support. The plan also provides risk adjustment, so those with greater medical needs receive a higher payment. … Based on consultation with the Office of the Actuary of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and using Congressional Budget Office [CBO] these reforms will make Medicare permanently solvent.” [American Road Map, accessed 1/27/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Rep. Jeb Hensarling Said That We Should Privatize Social Security And Medicare. “Democrats are hoping to make the GOP pay for Jeb Hensarling's brief sojourn onto ye olde political third rail (health care's the new one) -- privatizing Social Security. On Monday, MSNBC's Chris Matthews asked the Texas Republican what solutions he had to cut the budget deficit, and Hensarling, straightforwardly replied that the only solution was to curb entitlements, including Social Security. ‘I'm willing to say that part of the social contract will need to be re-engineered,’ Hensarling said, ‘You can get better health care and better retirement security if you go to a defined contribution plan. We had this debate in Social Security a few years ago,’ added Hensarling, who predicted that such a program would have to be part of any GOP alternative budget-cutting plan.” [Politico, 2/2/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Nine House Republicans Have Co-Sponsored Ryan’s Budget Plan. “So far, nine Republicans including Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD), Rep. Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) have signed on to co-sponsor Ryan's budget roadmap.” [TPM, 2/9/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Reps. Bob Inglis And Rep. Jeff Flake Support Ryan’s Budget “Roadmap.” “Rep. Bob Inglis (R-SC) testified today before the House Budget Committee that a proposal to dramatically overhaul entitlement programs is ‘bold’ and signed on as a co-sponsor of Rep. Paul Ryan's budget ‘roadmap’ plan which cuts and then partially privatizes Social Security and creates a voucher system for Medicare. Inglis said in testimony today that he's ‘comfortable’ with the plan, which he said would help ‘get our fiscal house in order.’ The Ryan plan also has new co-sponsors: Rep. Jeff Flake (R-AZ).” [TPM, 3/3/10</div><div><br /></div><div><b>4. &nbsp; &nbsp; EXTEND THE BUSH TAX BREAKS FOR THE WEALTHY AND BIG OIL</b></div><div><br /></div><div>At a cost of nearly $700 billion, extend the Bush tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans and big oil, which are set to expire and which have and will continue to explode the federal budget deficit.</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Sen. John Kyl’s Spokesman Argued That Extending The Bush Tax Cuts Was Important Regardless Of Its Impact On The Deficit. “After Senate Republicans used the increasing deficit as an excuse to shoot down Democratic attempts to extend unemployment benefits, Democrats are questioning if that commitment to fiscal discipline will continue when it comes time to extend the Bush tax cuts. … Some Republicans contend there is a distinction between opposing legislation that extends spending measures, like the extender bill, and voting against tax increases that would negatively affect working families, even if both proposals add to the red ink in Washington. ‘Allowing Americans to keep more of their money through tax rate reductions is an entirely separate issue,’ said Ryan Patmintra, a spokesman for Senate Republican Whip Jon Kyl (Ariz.). ‘If our hope is to get Americans back to work, wouldn’t it make sense to leave capital with the small businesses and taxpayers who actually create jobs?’” [The Hill, 6/27/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Minority Leader Mitch McConnell Said That Kyl’s View Was The “Majority Republican View” And Said “There’s No Evidence Whatsoever That The Bush Tax Cuts Actually Diminished Revenue.” “That's been the majority Republican view for some time," Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told TPMDC this afternoon after the weekly GOP press conference. &nbsp;"That there's no evidence whatsoever that the Bush tax cuts actually diminished revenue. They increased revenue, because of the vibrancy of these tax cuts in the economy. So I think what Senator Kyl was expressing was the view of virtually every Republican on that subject." [TPM, 7/13/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Sen. Tom Coburn Said That Extending The Bush Tax Cuts “Isn’t A Cost.” Sen. Tom Coburn: “Continuing the [Bush] tax cuts isn’t a cost, if you added new taxes, new tax cuts, I would agree that’s a cost. It’s not a cost. That’s where we are today. That’s the baseline. It doesn’t score anything to continue them. It costs money if we increase, which I would be willing to do. I think we ought to cut corporate taxes.” [C-SPAN, 7/14/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; FL Senate Candidate Marco Rubio Said He Was In Favor Of Making The Bush Tax Cuts Permanent. Marco Rubio: “I would argue in favor of making permanent the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts. And I would argue doing it now, before they recess, so that people have some level of certainty.” [Fox News, 6/28/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Sen. Judd Gregg Said That The Bush Tax Cuts “Should Not Have To Be Offset.” However, the GOP's top budget guy, Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH), disagrees. He said Kyl's prescription -- offset spending with tax increases or program cuts, but treat tax cuts differently -- is exactly right. "It makes a lot of sense, because, you know, when you're raising taxes you're taking money out of peoples' pockets," said Gregg when asked by TPMDC. "When you're spending money, you're spending money that is -- it's not the same thing because it's growing the government. So I tend to think that tax cuts should not have to be offset." [TPM, 7/13/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Sen. Chuck Grassley Said That It Was A “Tax Increase If You Don’t Extend” The Bush Tax Cuts And Sen. Mike Crapo Said “There’s A Distinction Between Taxes And Spending.” “Republicans almost unanimously oppose spending $33.9 billion for extended unemployment benefits for some 2.5 million people who've lost them, because they say it would increase federal budget deficits. At the same time, they're pushing a permanent extension of Bush administration tax cuts, especially for the wealthy, which could increase federal budget deficits by trillions of dollars over the next 10 years. How do they justify this? ‘Tax policy is dynamic. If you have the right kind of tax reform, it helps generate a more dynamic economy,’ said Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, a member of the Senate Finance Committee, which writes tax law. While that may be true, even the Bush Treasury Department concluded that its tax cuts increase budget deficits. Besides, wouldn't providing $33.9 billion to extend unemployment benefits to 2.5 million people help the economy? ‘There's a distinction between taxes and spending,’ Crapo said. ‘We have a huge problem with a lack of spending restraint.’ In addition, noted Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley, the committee's top Republican, ‘This is a tax increase if you don't extend, and it's not a tax cut if you do.’” [McClatchy, 7/14/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; CA Senate Candidate Carly Fiorina Said That “You Don’t Need To Pay For Tax Cuts.” Now Carly Fiorina is joining the cause. In an interview with KCBS's Doug Sovern and CBS 5's Simon Perez today, she said that "you don't need to pay for tax cuts." Fiorina: “Let me propose something that may seem crazy to you: you don't need to pay for tax cuts. They pay for themselves, if they are targeted, because they create jobs....We're getting ready to increase the taxes on capital formation. That's a really bad idea in the middle of a recession. Why are we making it harder for people to invest capital? We should be making it easier!” [Calitics, 7/12/10]</div><div><br /></div><div><b>5. &nbsp; &nbsp; REPEAL WALL STREET REFORM</b></div><div><br /></div><div>Roll back the toughest consumer protections ever enacted, allow banks to continue to grow too big to fail, and ensure that predatory lenders continue to utilize their most abusive practices.</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; CNN: “Top House Republican Calls For Repeal Of Wall Street Bill.” “Hours before expected passage Thursday afternoon of the Wall Street reform bill, the top House Republican called for the legislation to be repealed. House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, told reporters, ‘I think it ought to be repealed. There are common sense things that you should do to plug the holes in the regulatory system that were there, and to bring more transparency to financial transactions, because transparency is like sunlight. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.’” [CNN, 7/15/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Rep. Mike Pence Called For The Repeal Of Wall Street Reform. Chairman of the House Republican Conference Mike Pence (R-Ind.) called for the repeal of the financial reform bill that was signed into law Wednesday. “About $3.7 trillion in taxpayer dollars have already been spent on bailouts of the financial system, and the American people have said, ‘No more,’” he said in a statement after President Barack Obama signed the bill. “We need to repeal this new Big Government program and replace it with common sense reform that protects taxpayers from bailouts, helps put Americans back to work and deals with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.” [Politico, 7/21/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Sen. Lamar Alexander Said That There Would Be An Effort To Repeal The Wall Street Bill. “After a vote this morning, TPMDC asked Lamar Alexander (R-TN), the third ranking Republican in the Senate, whether Republicans would make a concerted push to repeal the financial reform bill. ‘Well, that's a good -- that's a good, that's a good question,’ Alexander said. ‘We're very disappointed with this...If we have a Congress with a majority of Republicans, and there are ways to improve it or fix it, I imagine there'll be an effort to do that.’” [TPM, 7/15/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Sen. Saxby Chambliss Said He’d “Love For It (Wall Street Reform) To Be Repealed.” Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-AL) said he’d “love for it to be repealed.” [Fox News, 7/16/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Sen. Richard Shelby Said That He And Other Republicans Would “Like To Repeal” Wall Street Reform. Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL), the ranking Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, told Good Morning America that he and other Republicans would “like to repeal it.” [ABC News, 7/16/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; WA Senate Candidate Dino Rossi Said He Would Favor Repealing Wall Street Reform. “Washington GOP Senate candidate Dino Rossi said Tuesday he'd favor repealing both healthcare reform and Wall Street reform. Rossi, who's challenging top Sen. Patty Murray (D) in this fall's elections, said he'd favor repealing the two signature issues Democrats have made into law this year. ‘We need to repeal that bill,’ Rossi said of healthcare reform on ABC News's "Top Line" webcast. He also said, when pressed, that Wall Street reform legislation signed into law last week by President Obama should be repealed and replaced with different reforms. ‘I think we should,’ he said of repealing the financial reform package.” [The Hill, 7/27/10]</div><div><br /></div><div><b>6. &nbsp; &nbsp; PROTECT THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OIL SPILL AND FUTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHES</b></div><div><br /></div><div>Cap liabilities for those responsible for environmental disasters like the Gulf oil spill and let companies like BP decide which victims deserve compensation for the disaster and what the timeline for relief should be.</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Senate Republicans Are Against A Tax On Oil Companies To Help Clean Up Future Oil Spills. “Senate Democratic leaders want to impose a 41 cent per barrel tax on oil companies to help clean up future spills — more than five times what the companies pay now — but Republicans say the effort is deceptive because there's no guarantee that the money would be used for that purpose. … The dispute is helping to stall an emergency spending bill that would revive expired unemployment benefits, provide money for summer jobs for at-risk youths and pay for other programs. The oil fee would help reduce the bill's potential deficit spending to about $78.6 billion over 10 years. ‘This is the ultimate exercise in bait and switch,’ Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., said Wednesday. ‘It steals that money out of the fund,’ said Sen. David Vitter, R-La., referring to the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund.” [McClatchy, 6/9/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Minority Leader John Boehner Said That Obama Overreacted To The BP Oil Spill. Boehner said Obama overreacted to the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The spill might warrant a "pause" in deepwater drilling, but Obama's blanket ban on drilling in the gulf -- which a judge overturned last week -- could devastate the region's economy, he said. Louisiana State University scientists estimate the ban could have affected more than 10,000 jobs. [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, 6/29/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Rep. Joe Barton Said “It Is A Tragedy Of The First Proportion That A Private Corporation Can Be Subjected To What I Would Characterize As A Shakedown, Is This Case A $20 Billion Shakedown. … So I Apologize.” Rep. Joe Barton, the ranking member of the committee, has bold words about the $20 billion escrow fund: "It is a tragedy of the first proportion that a private corporation can be subjected to what I would characterize as a shakedown, in this case a $20 billion shakedown ... a $20 billion slush fund, that's unprecedented in our nation's history, that has no legal standing. … So I'm only speaking for myself, I'm not speaking for anybody else. But I apologize. I do not want to live in a country where any time a citizen or a corporation does something that is legitimately wrong, is subject to to some sort of political pressure that is, again, in my words, amounts to a shakedown. So I apologize." [TPM, 6/17/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Sen. John Cornyn, On Barton, Said, "I Share The Concern." Asked about Rep. Barton calling the escrow account a "shakedown," Sen. John Cornyn, chair of the NRSC, responded that he's glad the money's there but understands where Barton is coming from. Cornyn: "I think it's comforting to know that there will be resources set aside and available to pay for legitimate claim.""I think it's good that there's going to be some money there, I don't know whether it's going to be enough money to pay all the claims. They should pay the legitimate claims. But the part that Representative Barton is expressing some concern about, that I share the concern, is this has really become a political issue for the President and he's trying to deal with it by showing how tough he's being against BP. The problem is BP's the only one who really is in control of shutting down this well, and he's trying to mitigate, I think, his own political problems." [TPM, 6/17/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Rep. Tom Price And The 114-Member Republican Study Committee Called The $20 Billion BP Escrow Account A “Chicago-Style Political Shakedown.” The Republican Study Committee, a group of conservative members of the House, released a statement today calling the $20 billion BP escrow account a "Chicago-style political shakedown." "BP's reported willingness to go along with the White House's new fund suggests that the Obama Administration is hard at work exerting its brand of Chicago-style shakedown politics, wrote chairman Tom Price (R-GA). "These actions are emblematic of a politicization of our economy that has been borne out of this Administration's drive for greater power and control."[TPM, 6/16/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Rep. Roy Blunt Declined to Criticize Barton When Asked, Saying, “Why Should I Comment on It?” “Rep. Roy Blunt said Monday that he's got nothing to say about Texas Rep. Joe Barton's apology last week to BP over what Barton called a ‘shakedown’ by the White House. Blunt, a Springfield Republican who is running for the U.S. Senate seat of retiring Sen. Kit Bond, spoke to reporters in a conference call to tout the fact that his campaign has traveled to all 114 counties in Missouri. Asked about the Barton flap, which occurred Thursday morning during a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee hearing, Blunt said he was not aware of the comments until later that day. ‘By the time I was aware of his comments, he had apologized for it,’ Blunt said. ‘He doesn't agree with his own comment, apparently, so why should I comment on it?’" [News Leader, 6/22/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Rep. Trent Franks Said Barton’s Comments Were A Reaction To The President “Not Possess[Ing] The Power Or Authority To Make Such An Arrogant Command To A Private Company.” Rep. Trent Franks defended both Rep. Barton and Rep. Price stating: “It’s my opinion that Mr. Barton and Mr. Price’s comments were more of a reaction to the arrogance in President Obama’s speech where he said he was going to 'inform' BP that they would set aside this separate compensation fund to be controlled by a third party. Under our laws and Constitution, the President does not possess the power or authority to make such an arrogant command to a private company.” [Rep Franks release, 6/18/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Rep. Steve King: Barton Was Right That $20 Billion Escrow Account Was A “Shakedown.” “One Republican lawmaker said Monday he agreed with Rep. Joe Barton's (R-Texas) apology to BP. &nbsp;Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) said he thought Barton was right to call the Obama administration's effort to force BP to create a $20 billion escrow account to pay out claims to victims of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill a ‘shakedown.’ ‘I think Joe Barton was spot-on when he called it a 'shakedown.' That's part of this administration's process,’ King said Monday on the conservative Laura Ingraham radio show. ‘If you look at all they have nationalized during this administration -- some started during the Bush administration -- it should tell you, they want to swallow up as many Fortune 500 companies as they can,’ he said.” [The Hill, 6/21/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Rep. Ralph Hall Defended Barton’s BP Apology. Rep. Ralph Hall: Defended Rep. Barton’s statement to BP CEO Hayward saying he probably meant to use “the word ‘disturbed’ – disturbed that the president would take action assessing a monetary figure against any American entity without constitutional or statutory authority.” [Dallas Morning News, 6/19/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Rep. Michele Bachmann Said The Administration’s Policy Toward BP Was “All About Extortion.” &nbsp;Rep. Michelle Bachmann (R-Minn.) said Tuesday that President Barack Obama is exceeding his legitimate constitutional authority in telling BP it must set up an independent fund, not controlled by the company, for compensating victims of the Gulf oil spill. She described the administration's policy as an action "that's all about extortion." [Fox News, 6/16/10]</div><div><br /></div><div><b>7. &nbsp; &nbsp; ABOLISH THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION</b></div><div><br /></div><div>Put the big banks back in charge of student loans and put an end to federal assistance for public schools.</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; KY Senate Candidate Rand Paul Wanted to Shut Down the Department of Education. Speaking at a debate with Trey Grayson in April 2010, Paul said the federal government should shut down certain agencies, such as the Department of Education, and impose a hiring freeze. [Lexington Herald-Leader, 4/6/10] &nbsp;[Bowling Green Daily News, 4/14/2010]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; NV Senate Candidate Sharron Angle Would Eliminate Departments Of Education And Energy. In a March 2010 e-interview with the conservative website Nevada News and Views, Sharron Angle told the site her proposed federal cuts "Should include the Department of Education, Department of Energy ...I include these cuts in my economic policy for taking back our government." [Nevada News and Views, 3/22/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; CO Senate Candidate Jane Norton Called For Eliminating The Department Of Education. “Former Lt. Governor Jane Norton said she was spurred to try to win Colorado Democrat Michael Bennet’s U.S. Senate seat by what she sees as the dramatic expansion of government in the Obama era. In stump speeches, emails and interviews, she has vowed to work to cut federal spending as a way to end the ‘government takeover’ of the private sector. One of the ways Norton proposes to trim spending is to eliminate the federal Department of Education.” [Colorado Independent, 12/15/09]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; The Maine Republican Party Overwhelmingly Approved A Proposed Party Platform That Calls For Elimination Of The Department Of Education. “An overwhelming majority of delegates to the Maine Republican convention tonight voted to scrap the proposed party platform and replace it with a document created by a group of Tea Party activists. The official platform for the Republican Party of Maine is now a mix of right-wing fringe policies, libertarian buzzwords and outright conspiracy theories. &nbsp;The document calls for the elimination of the Department of Education.” [Maine Politics, 5/10/10]</div><div><br /></div><div><b>8. &nbsp; &nbsp; ABOLISH THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY</b></div><div><br /></div><div>End America's investments in a clean energy future and disband the organization responsible for oversight of nuclear materials.</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; NV Senate Candidate Sharron Angle Would Eliminate Departments Of Education And Energy. In a March 2010 e-interview with the conservative website Nevada News and Views, Sharron Angle told the site her proposed federal cuts "Should include the Department of Education, Department of Energy ...I include these cuts in my economic policy for taking back our government." [Nevada News and Views, 3/22/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Sen. Jeff Sessions Sympathized With The Idea Of Getting Rid Of The Department Of Energy. “Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), another conservative, said he doesn’t support eliminating the departments, but sympathized with candidates like Angle and Republican Rand Paul of Kentucky who have made similar pleas on the campaign trail. ‘You are out there – and you are a citizen of America – and you are concerned about the country and some of these departments are top heavy, inefficient and unproductive - and you get to Washington and you find out you can’t make that change,’ Sessions said. ‘But to say that somebody who expressed concern about the departments that are not productive ought to be eliminated, I don’t think it’s out of mainstream, I think most Americans would tend to agree.’” [Politico, 6/16/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Kansas Congressional Candidate Dave Kind Called For Getting Rid Of The EPA, Department Of Energy And Department Of Education. “The final of the seven candidates saying they have more to offer than political experience is Dave King, 67, Leawood. King said the nation was being destroyed by those in office currently, and he said it all centers around the idea that the government is overspending. Some of King’s ideas to bring spending down are to get rid of the health care bill, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Energy and the Department of Education.” [Lawrence Journal-World, 7/25/10]</div><div><br /></div><div><b>9. &nbsp; &nbsp; ABOLISH THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY</b></div><div><br /></div><div>Gut the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act -- which together protect our kids from air pollution and keep drinking water safe -- disband the watchdog that holds polluters accountable.</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; KY Senate Candidate Rand Paul: Get Rid Of Regulations, Get Rid of EPA, Get Rid of OSHA. Speaking about the economy and jobs, Paul said the government should stay completely out of the private sector so businesses can earn as much as possible. “Get rid of regulations. Get the EPA out of our coal business down here. Get OSHA out of our small businesses. We need to restrain government to let small businesses and businessmen and women create jobs.” [Happy Hour, Fox Business Network, 1/22/2010]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Kansas Congressional Candidate Dave Kind Called For Getting Rid Of The EPA, Department Of Energy And Department Of Education. “The final of the seven candidates saying they have more to offer than political experience is Dave King, 67, Leawood. King said the nation was being destroyed by those in office currently, and he said it all centers around the idea that the government is overspending. Some of King’s ideas to bring spending down are to get rid of the health care bill, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Energy and the Department of Education.” [Lawrence Journal-World, 7/25/10]</div><div><br /></div><div><b>10. &nbsp; &nbsp; REPEAL THE 17th AMENDMENT</b></div><div><br /></div><div>Take away your right to pick your U.S. Senator.</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Rep. Paul Broun Said He Wanted To Repeal The 17th Amendment, Which Provides For The Direct Election Of U.S. Senators. Rep. Paul Broun: “Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson started this process of socializing America, and they did it with the, Woodrow Wilson, particularly, pushes the 16th amendment that taxes income directly, and the 17th amendment that allows the direct elect of US senators, because the US senators initially were supposed to represent the states. [...] I’d like to see the 16th amendment and the 17th amendment to be repealed finally, and that’s going to be a long process.” [Think Progress, 7/9/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Rep. Louie Gohmert Called Sponsored A Bill Calling For The Elimination Of The Direct Popular Election Of Senators. “Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) is calling for a strong re-assertion of states rights against Congress -- in the form of a Constitutional amendment to eliminate the direct popular election of Senators, and go back to the pre-17th Amendment setup of state legislatures appointing them. ‘Ever since the safeguard of State legislatures electing U.S. Senators was removed by the 17th Amendment in 1913, there has been no check or balance on the Federal power grab for the last 97 years,’ Gohmert said in a press release, calling for a constitutional convention of the states. ‘Article V requires a minimum of 34 states to request a Convention which in this case, would be an Amendment Convention for only ONE amendment.’” [TPM, 3/23/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; Ohio Congressional Candidate Steve Stivers Supported Abolishing The 17th Amendment. “[Steve] Stivers recently filled out a questionnaire for a local 912 Project group that lays out some of his more conservative leanings. On the form, Stivers criticizes cap-and-trade legislation and praises the Stupak amendment that puts greater restrictions on abortion funding. He also advocates for taking away the voter’s right to elect a U.S. senator and returning that power to state legislatures. Stivers acknowledged that repealing the 17th Amendment isn’t really a priority right now, but he said he sympathizes with its federalist underpinnings.” [The Hill, 1/11/10]</div><div><br /></div><div>· &nbsp; &nbsp; The Idaho Republican Party Platform Calls For Abolishing The 17th Amendment. The Idaho Republican Party platform calls for abolishing the seventeenth amendment, because having state legislatures appoint U.S. senators again would "[restore] the constitution’s checks and balances that protects the rights and sovereignty of the states." [Idaho Republican Platform, 6/26/10]</div>]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/the_republican_9.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/the_republican_9.php</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:44:41 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Chairman Kaine Condemns Republican Obstruction of the DISCLOSE Act</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Today, Democrats in the Senate moved to advance the DISCLOSE Act, but Republicans continued to obstruct the bill.  This bipartisan legislation, which has already been passed in the House despite near-unanimous Republican opposition, addresses many of the campaign finance problems raised by the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision. It requires corporations and organizations to disclose their role in political ads, as well as the donors whose contributions helped to put those corporate ads on the air.  Following the Senate vote, DNC Chairman Tim Kaine issued the following statement:<br />
 <br />
<blockquote><p>“Today, Republicans in the Senate once again acted to protect their special interest allies by blocking a fair up-or-down vote on the DISCLOSE Act, which tackles the lack of transparency and influx of influence and spending by special interests in the wake of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling and addresses the enormous new-found political power of big corporations and their lobbyists to freely and anonymously influence elections.  The DISCLOSE Act is critical legislation that should be passed before monied special interests can influence the outcome of even one election.  It is simply unacceptable that foreign entities could be allowed to influence American elections, that corporations and lobbyists be permitted to finance electoral smear campaigns, and that the American voters might never know which organizations are behind such dirty politicking.  The DISCLOSE Act addresses every single one of those problems and ensures that the voices of the American people – not just big businesses and big spenders – are heard in the political process.</p><p>“After a year of defending big banks, big insurance, big oil, and other special interests, Republicans might want to drown out the voices of Americans who don’t have the financial resources of big corporations but want to have their say in this year’s elections.  But this bill isn’t just about any one election. A free and fair electoral process is the foundation of our democracy, and we must do everything possible to preserve the integrity of that process.  I urge Republicans to abandon their obstruction of this critical bill and to stand behind fair elections rather than standing with the corporate interests and their lobbyists.”</p></blockquote></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/chairman_kaine_24.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/chairman_kaine_24.php</guid>
<category>Blog</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:37:18 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>President Obama: ‘A vote against the DISCLOSE Act is a vote to allow corporate and special interest takeovers of our elections’</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/U-E7DYqPj_w&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="wmode" value="opaque"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/U-E7DYqPj_w&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" width="480" height="295" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p><p>With an important vote expected today on the DISCLOSE Act, President Obama urged the Senate to pass the bill that would require corporate political advertisers to reveal who&rsquo;s funding their election-related activities.</p><p>The DISCLOSE Act undoes some of the damage from the <em>Citizens United</em> Supreme Court case, which ruled that big corporations can spend unlimited amounts of money influencing our elections, without having to reveal that they&rsquo;re doing so.</p><p>Unfortunately, as they have done on unemployment benefits and tax credits, Republicans in the Senate are doing everything they can to block this bill from moving forward.</p><p><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-disclose-act" target="_blank">President Obama:</a></p><blockquote><p>Now, you&rsquo;d think that making these reforms would be a matter of common sense, particularly since they primarily involve just making sure that folks who are financing these ads are disclosed so that the American people can make up their own minds.&nbsp; Nobody is saying you can&rsquo;t run the ads -- just make sure that people know who in fact is behind financing these ads.&nbsp; And you&rsquo;d think that reducing corporate and even foreign influence over our elections would not be a partisan issue.&nbsp; But of course, this is Washington in 2010.&nbsp; And the Republican leadership in the Senate is once again using every tactic and every maneuver they can to prevent the DISCLOSE Act from even coming up for an up or down vote.&nbsp; Just like they did with unemployment insurance for Americans who&rsquo;d lost their jobs in this recession.&nbsp; Just like they&rsquo;re doing by blocking tax credits and lending assistance for small business owners.&nbsp; On issue after issue, we are trying to move America forward, and they keep on trying to take us back.</p><p>At a time of such challenge for America, we can&rsquo;t afford these political games.&nbsp; Millions of Americans are struggling to get by, and their voices shouldn&rsquo;t be drowned out by millions of dollars in secret, special interest advertising.&nbsp; The American people&rsquo;s voices should be heard.</p></blockquote>]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/president_obama_102.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/president_obama_102.php</guid>
<category>Blog</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:33:27 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Morning Open Thread</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Good morning.</p>

<center><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4105/4831939842_40d97fe926_b.jpg" width="500px"><br/><br/><i>President Barack Obama greets crew members from the Space Shuttle Atlantis and the International Space Station in the Oval Office, July 26, 2010. Photo by Pete Souza.</i></center>]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/morning_open_th_444.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/morning_open_th_444.php</guid>
<category>Blog</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Chairman Kaine on the 20th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Today is the 20th anniversary of the enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act on July 26, 1990.  In recognition of that occasion, DNC Chairman Tim Kaine issued the following statement:</p>

<blockquote><p>“The Americans with Disabilities Act was an important milestone not only for Americans with disabilities but for our country as a whole.  With the ADA, America opened the door of opportunity for tens of millions who had for too long been prevented from fully participating in the opportunities and responsibilities presented by American society.  As a result of this legislation, Americans with disabilities have been empowered to engage more fully -- and our country is stronger for it.</p><p>“I would like to join with President Obama and Americans across the country not only in recognizing the anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act, but also the incredible contributions Americans with disabilities make to this country on a daily basis.  Americans with disabilities are loving parents, diligent workers and entrepreneurs, and active members of their communities.  It is critical that we not only celebrate the past progress made by and for those individuals, but that we also continue to work to include all Americans in the possibilities our country has to offer.” </p></blockquote>
]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/chairman_kaine_23.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/chairman_kaine_23.php</guid>
<category>Blog</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:16:28 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>President Obama on the Republican Economic Agenda: &quot;The same policies that led us into this recession&quot;</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cseoWNtVe5U&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="wmode" value="opaque"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cseoWNtVe5U&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" width="480" height="295" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p><p>Last week the Republican leader in the House offered his own jobs plan&mdash;a plan <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/boehners-recipe-for-creating-jobs-go-backward-a-couple-years.php" target="_blank">Talking Points Memo described as &quot;Do Nothing&quot;</a>: </p><blockquote><p>House Minority Leader John Boehner outlined the top three measures he'd pursue if he becomes Speaker of the House next Congress to create new jobs. But, those who thought he'd outline specific programs and how they would create jobs were disappointed with a familiar litany of wish-list items: repeal health care reform, eschew climate legislation, and renew the Bush tax cuts.</p><p>In other words, repeal a program that largely hasn't yet taken effect; prevent new legislation that is also not in effect; and keep a current tax structure in place.</p></blockquote><p>In <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/weekly-address-president-obama-praises-new-wall-street-reform-law-says-gop-plan-wil">this week's address</a>, President Obama challenged Republicans to embrace new ideas to create jobs instead of bringing back the failed policies of the past:</p><blockquote><p>&ldquo;These are not new ideas.&nbsp; They are the same policies that led us into this recession.&nbsp; They will not create jobs, they will kill them.&nbsp; They will not reduce our deficit, they will add $1 trillion to our deficit.&nbsp; They will take us backward at a time when we need to keep America moving forward.</p><p>&ldquo;I know times are tough.&nbsp; I know that the progress we&rsquo;ve made isn&rsquo;t good enough for the millions of Americans who are still out of work or struggling to pay the bills.&nbsp; But I also know the character of this nation.&nbsp; I know that in times of great challenge and difficulty, we don&rsquo;t fear the future &ndash; we shape the future.&nbsp; We harness the skills and ingenuity of the most dynamic country on Earth to reach a better day.&nbsp; We do it with optimism, and we do it with confidence.&nbsp; That&rsquo;s the spirit we need right now, and that&rsquo;s the future I know we can build together.&rdquo;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
<link>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/president_obama_101.php</link>
<guid>http://www.democrats.org/a/2010/07/president_obama_101.php</guid>
<category>Blog</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:58:15 -0500</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>